历史性的体制和当下主义:弗朗索瓦·阿赫多戈的历史时间研究述评//[Regime of Historicity and Presentism: A Review of François Hartog’s Historical Studies of Time]

In his Régimes d'historicité.Présentisme et expériences du temps,Fran9 ois Hartog analysed several regimes of historicity, which he defined as ways of articulation of the past, present and future.In different societies there are probably different ways of articulation of the three temporal dimensions, such as heroic regime, “ancien régime” and modern regime remarked in his work.But these regimes are not monolithic, some incongruences could emerge from within, and one regime could transform to another.These moments of incongruence and transformation are labelled by Hartog as gap or crisis of temporal order.In Occident an emerging crisis of temporal order in the last decades is brewing a new regime of historicity, called as presentism, which is relatively disorderly temporal order without glorious horizon of expectation, and differs from the modern regime in that the latter embraces futurist perspective and continuity between past and present.
在《历史性的体制:当下主义与时间经验》一书中,弗朗索瓦·阿赫多戈对几种"历史性体制"进行了分析,他将这一概念定义为过去、现在和未来之间的纽合方式,不同的社会可能有不同的纽合方式,如历史性的英雄体制、"旧制度"和现代体制。这些体制并非静态的,它们可以从一种体制转向另一种,这样的时刻被阿赫多戈称为时间秩序的危机。最近几十年西方世界出现的时间秩序危机孕育出一种新的体制:当下主义,它不同于采取未来主义视角、强调过去与当下连续性的现代性体制,而是一种相对无序、不再具有光辉期待视阈的时间秩序。